Teen drivers have the highest fatal crash risk of any age group. Per mile traveled, they have the highest involvement rates in all types of crashes, from those involving only property damage to those that are fatal. The problem is worst among 16 year-olds, who have the most limited driving experience that often results in risk-taking behind the wheel.
Crash Risk Factors
* Driver error
Compared with crashes of older drivers, those of teenagers more often involve driver error.
* Speeding
Excessive speed is a factor in higher crash rates among 16-year-old drivers.
* Single-vehicle crashes
More fatal crashes of teenage drivers involve only the teen’s vehicle. Typically, these involve high speed and/or driver error.
* Passengers
Fatal crashes among teens are more likely to occur when other teenagers are in the car. The risk increases with every additional passenger. In 2003, 59 percent of teenage passenger deaths happened in vehicles driven by another teenager.
* Alcohol
Although this is a problem among drivers of all ages, it’s actually less of a problem for drivers ages 16 and 17. In 2003, the estimated percent of fatally injured passenger vehicle drivers of this age who had blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) at or above 0.08 percent was 16 percent — down 60 percent since 1982.
* Night driving
This is a high-risk activity for beginners. Per mile driven, the crash rate for teenagers driving at night with passengers is 4 to 5 times more likely than teenagers who drive alone during the day. (Source: National Safety Council Launching New Window , 2005)
* Low seat belt use
Teenagers generally are less likely to use safety belts than adults. In 2003, 57 percent of 16- to 20-year-old passenger vehicle occupants killed in crashes were not wearing safety belts. (Source:National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Launching New Window , 2005)
Ford Motor Co. is using the Los Angeles Auto Show this month to showcase a 2011 model of the F-550 Super Duty chassis cab, upfitted as a fire department first-responder vehicle, with the company’s new Power Stroke V-8 diesel engine.
Ford introduced the company-built diesel earlier this year. The engine will replace the current model, built by Navistar International Corp., beginning next year in 2011 model-year trucks.
Ford decided to develop and build the engine after disputes with Navistar over warranty costs and payments led to a mutual agreement to end the 27-year relationship after Dec. 31.
Adam Gryglak had what seemed like an impossible task: deliver an all-new Ford (F) diesel engine in 36 months. Ford was way behind schedule, so the time frame was a year faster than usual. Gryglak, the chief diesel engineer, knew he’d never meet his deadline without short-circuiting the usual development process. So he put together a team, moved off campus, and kept his second-guessing bosses at bay. Gryglak called the project Scorpion (after the heavy metal band the Scorpions) and came up with a logo featuring a menacing mechanical insect. In mid-September, on schedule and to strong reviews, Ford unveiled the new Super Duty pickup—powered by Project Scorpion’s engine—at the Texas State Fair. Gryglak had shown that the classic skunkworks model pioneered by Lockheed Martin (LMT) in the 1930s could help Ford protect its flank, in this case the highly lucrative market for contractor-grade pickup trucks. “We have a good product-development system,” Gryglak says. “The key was to respect what we have and the people who run it, deconstruct it a bit, and make it better to suit our target.”
Gryglak’s task was doubly difficult. For one thing, Ford had previously outsourced the design and manufacture of the engine, known as the Powerstroke, to truck and engine maker Navistar (NAV). What’s more, the Powerstroke brand had eroded in recent years because of quality problems. Gryglak didn’t just need to design and build an engine in-house from scratch—he needed to vastly improve it if Ford were to keep dominating the market for large pickups, which in good years have generated much of its overall profit.
Beyond the Bounds
Like all big companies, Ford has a strict product-development hierarchy. It works well enough nowadays that the carmaker can get new models from blueprint to showroom as fast or faster than its rivals. Going offsite inevitably made executives anxious. But Gryglak’s pitch got a better reception than it might have, say, five years ago, when turf-obsessed managers tended to look unkindly on heterodoxy.
In October 2006, Gryglak began recruiting his team of engineers. He discovered that not everyone was eager to work beyond the bounds of Ford’s familiar environment. Some engineers craved structure. “We had people self-select out because they weren’t comfortable working outside their comfort zone,” says Gryglak. But others couldn’t wait to be asked. Ken Pumford, an engineer from Ford’s Kentucky truck plant, moved from Louisville to Dearborn, Mich., to join the project.
It wasn’t long before the benefits began to emerge. Specialists used to working only with their own kind became more familiar with what other engineers were up to. “We saved months by knowing hourly what the other guys were thinking and what their problems were,” says Pat Morgan, a veteran Ford engineer. “The result was that the engine fit into the truck perfectly the first time, and that almost never happens.”
The team also let go of certain Fordisms. The company has long forced suppliers to adapt their technology in hundreds of time-consuming ways to Ford specifications. Engineers, after all, justify their paychecks by coming up with engineering tweaks. With time short, the team learned to trust suppliers more. For example, Ford let the German company Bosch work on the engine’s antipollution device with minimal reengineering for its own sake.
Fun and Games
Freed from the rigid atmosphere of Ford’s tech center, the engineers let themselves have fun. They played jokes on each other, building full-size snowmen, decorated with machine parts, on one another’s desks. Gryglak also encouraged friendly competition. In August 2007, after months of R&D but before starting to build the engine, the team organized a Pinewood Derby competition. Design and mechanical engineers, of course, weren’t about to whittle cars from wood the way Cub Scouts do. They milled cars out of aluminum. Some had remote controls and electric motors.
As the team worked in isolation, Gryglak’s bosses had a hard time staying in the background. Bob Fascetti, Ford’s chief engineer of big engines, forced himself to check in with the team only every four to six weeks instead of the usual weekly or biweekly intervals. “It was tough for me to do,” he says. “But to keep [the project] on track, I convinced my bosses it would be better to leave them alone.” Fascetti says things got tense when Team Scorpion decided to build the engine out of a lighter material that would make the truck more fuel-efficient. Doing so was more expensive, with a greater risk of failure. By the time Fascetti and his own bosses found out, the decision had been made. Gryglak faced some tough questioning, but he got the green light.
The new Super Duty truck goes on sale in the spring. Ford says the engine will be the first of its kind to use state-of-the art antipollution technology that meets new federal regulations. The truck also will have the best fuel economy in its category and won’t need significant maintenance for 300,000 miles. The best part, says Tony Hudson, a Project Scorpion engineer, is that the team pulled off what initially had seemed impossible. “That,” he says, “will give us license to do it again.”
Ford has confirmed in a press conference today that all substantive commercial terms regarding the sale of Volvo have been settled between the American firm and the Chinese buyer, Geely. In other words, the last arrangements to sell Volvo have been made.
The final agreement remains to be signed in the first quarter of 2010 with the closing of the sale likely to end in the second quarter of next year. However, Ford and Geely haven’t worked out the transaction completely as small points still remain to be settled between the two car manufacturers. Final documentation, financing and government approvals still have to be sorted out. Even after the sale will be made, Ford will still continue to cooperate with Volvo in the developing of their cars but they do not want to retain a stake in the Swedish manufacturer.
Further information will be made available once the deal is signed in the first quarter of 2010.
Now in its second year of production, the aptly named Ford Flex fits two voids in Ford’s lineup – it’s both a minivan and crossover. The former term is a dirty word in the automotive marketplace these days, unlike the latter, which usually includes all-wheel drive vehicles, sized like SUVs but closer to the ground. While it may not be as tall as full-size SUVs, it surely provides the same amount of room, if not more. So how does the Flex drive and execute its duties? Read on to find out.
The Flex is a long vehicle. Its shorter height makes it look even longer. Its overall shape can be compared to the Mini Cooper, albeit much larger. It’s also reminiscent of the “woodies” from the 1940s and ’50s, with boxy lines and the sculpting on the doors. The front end features the Ford corporate grille, which consists of 3 horizontal chrome bars, and with the wide and flat hood, gives the Flex a snub-nose look, which I find attractive. The lines on the Flex are mostly straight, which works with this body style, and any curves other than the wheel wells would break up the paradigm Ford’s designers were going for. While driving the Flex, I found that its looks were polarizing. Passers-by either loved it, or hated it.
Continuing the retro but modern design on the interior, Ford fitted the Flex with modern gauges, controls, materials, but used a retro pattern on the seats. A comfortable place to sit, the driver’s seat featured 6 ways of power adjustments, including forward/backward, up/down, and seat cushion angle. Lumbar support adjustments are accomplished by turning a knob on the side of the seat, and the seat back’s angle is controlled by a lever which provides plenty of available angles. The driver’s seat can be raised or lowered a good amount, which leaves plenty of head and leg room for taller drivers or people who want to sit higher. The steering wheel was disappointing though, with only tilt and no telescope. Another missing feature on the tester, but an option on SEL and Limited trim levels, is adjustable pedals.
The rest of the interior is nicely done, with a lot of soft touch plastics, mixed in with harder plastics for controls and surfaces which might take more abuse. The gauges and controls all feature “Ice Blue” lighting, which is nice to look at but can be distracting at night. There are more buttons on the dashboard than expected, but thankfully the audio and HVAC knobs are big and easy to reach. The knobs also feature good detents for positive feedback when driving, so you know exactly how far you turned up the radio without having to look over at the display. The gauges are easy to read as well, although the speedometer only has markings every 20 MPH. If the lighting is too bright, you can use a dimmer switch to tone down all the interior lighting. Moving to the back seat, there is a huge amount of leg room and deep cushions for passengers, but the standard 3rd row is strictly for children.
The third row seat limits the cargo area, a disappointment that is somewhat mitigated by the fold-flat seats, and points to the Flex as more of a people hauler than a cargo hauler. Albeit small, the cargo area is easily accessed, only requiring a slight pull on the liftgate before the struts take over and lift it the rest of the way. If you fill up the cargo area, there’s plenty of room to put bags or other detritus between the first and second row of seats.
For your listening pleasure, the Ford Flex features a 6-speaker audio system tied into the optional SYNC system, although it’s only so-so. Clarity from the speakers is ok while not great, and the lower bass notes are a bit boomy, which was a let-down. For anyone who is unhappy with the audio, an optional Sony system is available, which sounds good in other Fords that I’ve driven. While the tester did not feature automatic climate control, it at least had temperature control for the rear seats, both on the dashboard and on the back of the center console.
Driving around town, the Flex has decent power, but passing maneuvers and quick acceleration are hampered by the overworked engine. Those who need more power will want to opt for the available EcoBoost engine, which comes packaged with all wheel drive. The EcoBoost engine will satisfy anyone’s need for more power in the Flex. The handling is also good, if not excellent, allowing more body movement than one would like to see, especially given how firm the suspension feels. While not overly stiff, you feel more of the road and its imperfections than most buyers of a crossover really want. Given the tester’s tire and wheel package, this was surprising. A good mark for the suspension is that going through curves with the Flex never caused it to become unsettled. The tires never made any noise, and traction was very good when going around corners at faster than normal speeds. The Flex’s cornering ability is a good match for the brakes, which worked well and hauled the crossover down from speed fairly quickly. They definitely don’t work like sports-car brakes, but were impressive for such a massive vehicle. Because of the steering and brakes, the Flex drives like a smaller vehicle than it is, with good manners on the highway and around town. Speaking of highway speeds, the loudest thing you’ll notice is the wind coming around the windshield and hitting the side-view mirrors, and only if you have the volume turned all the way down on the radio.
Conclusion:
The Ford Flex is an interesting vehicle. A throwback to cars from the past, but with features like SYNC and rear seat temperature control, a link to more modern cars. A comfortable drive which won’t do anything too surprising, it makes a good people-hauler, if not the best cargo vehicle.
Competitors: Chevrolet Traverse, Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander
As-Tested:
Year: 2010
Make: Ford
Model: Flex SE FWD
EPA Fuel Mileage: 17/24 City/Highway
Base Price: $28,550.00
Options:
$570: Class III Trailer Tow Package
$395: SYNC Voice Activated System
$395: White Two-Tone Roof
Total: $29,910
Destination: $775
As-Tested Price: $30,685
Ford has an online Window Sticker viewer. Click here to view the Window Sticker for the actual test vehicle.
Special thanks to Steve Fransisco and Century Ford of Mt. Airy, MD for loaning the tester to Road Reality. Click here to view their web site.
Here is a little SNEAK PEAK of the 2010 Boost Bunny Calendars!! Above is Nicole, the winner of the Orange County Diesel’s Boost Bunny Amateur Glamor Contest, Miss Boost Bunny 2009!
Calendar Features:
Format: Standard Wall Calendar Time Span: 12 Month & Centerfold Publisher: Orange County Diesel Status: Pre-Order ISBN: 978-0-615-33226-0
Check out Miss Boost Bunny 2009, Nicole featured on the Cover & Centerfold, as well as the TOP Boost Bunny Finalists in Orange County Diesel’s 2010 Boost Bunny Calendar, the Girls of Diesel on Edge!
Notice the original paint vs. the mis-colored respray
Here’s an image of what the original “playmate pink” on a ford mustang looked like. This photo was taken during the current dismantling and restoration of my 1965 convertible.
When I compare this original paint to 1957 Ford Thunderbird color charts from Ditzler, the color matches up perfectly to Ford’s Dusk Rose.
It’s my belief that the color on the early 1965/1966 “playmate pink” mustangs was in fact Ford Dusk Rose, but because it was not on any paint charts in the mid ’60’s, combined with the hype that came with the playboy giveaway, the “playmate pink” term has gained popularity in popular terminology and led to confusion as to what the original “pink” actually was on the early Mustangs.
I read Carl Sagan’s Dance Party pretty regularly, but I have to complain that John Titor sets a bad example. He recently stopped using his old GE brand time-machine in favor of a Honda Paradox. This is an outrage! I had always looked up to Titor as an inspiration for my blind, burning patriotism.
However, the fact is that we’re falling too far behind the rest of the world as far as time travel technology is concerned. Just the other day I was watching CNN and they did a story on the progress the Japanese have made in the field. They already have perfected the ionic generators for producing the space-time warp tunnels. They have even harnessed zero point energy to power the hydraulic pressure chambers. Why is it then that we, the United States of Freakin’ A, still rely upon coal powered time machines? Sure, we all know someone who can afford one of the GM Flux models. They harness zero-point energy, but they are far too expensive. I think the government should be spending it’s time and energy helping out the AMERICAN time travel industry rather than wasting it on healthcare.
Of course, we still lead the world in some aspects of time travel. For example, we are the leading exporter of dylipsion crystal stabilizers for the Ford 2009 time machines. But what we have in quantity, we lack in quality. Why is it that consumer reports rated American dylipsion crystal stabilizers made by Hourglass Incorporated as fourth throughout the world in quality. Oftentimes the stabilizers will even shatter in mid-time conversion resulting in painful injuries. I don’t want to worry about that as I go back to kill my great, great, great grandfather and create a paradox as I do every Tuesday.
Let us try to reclaim the golden age of time travel. I remember in the 50’s, there were some great radian light converters, not like the Japanese models we use now that experience flux velocity impact often during the first time-warp generation. This is not an impossible dream. An American professor at Harvard, Dr. Harvey Donagan has recently unveiled his new radian light converter model. He then went 50 years into the future right as the newest soylent was being released to the public and yelled, “Soylent green is people!” That guy sure knows how to have fun. Anyway, this newer model is more compact and efficient than even the Hourglass Incorporated’s 450 Model. If we could have this kind of innovation in all of the industry, then perhaps we could reclaim our spot as the #1 Time Machine manufacturer.
Maybe I’m over-reacting about all of this. It’s probably because Toyota released the new S-6 Model with a newer more efficient perpetual motion machine. That thing generates an infinite amount of energy with no pollution. I just wish I could feel that kind of pride about my nation.
Some people might say that discussing the time travel industry is “a waste of time,” “completely pointless,” or “unbelievably insane.” But I say to these people: “Isn’t this what America was founded for? If this nation isn’t about discussing the shortcomings of an industry that doesn’t even exist, then what is it about?” Besides, anything I could say about anything else wouldn’t make any difference because the entire world is under the control of the Freemasons and the Illuminati anyway.
Congrats to Dodge on this one. Yes, it’s merely the opinion of some journalist that the all new Ram Heavy Duty is the best new truck, but it’s not like the praise isn’t warranted. Dodge know who they are up against and what they have to do to beat the likes of the Ford Super Duty, Chevy Silverado HD, GMC Sierra HD, and ToyotaTundra 4.6. Kudos to them for meeting the challenge head-on.
In contrast to the post I made about the Dodge Caliber, the new Ram is something that Dodge got right on all fronts. Inside and out, under the hood, under the bodywork, the chassis, the price…everything just works. Kudos to you, Dodge.
It has since held
on to the spot on the album charts.
Boyle
is said to have already made £5million in two weeks from 3.3m global sales
of her debut album of the same name.
It was the best US opening for a female artist's debut album, and the second
best overall, since Nielsen SoundScan began tracking sales in 1991,
according to Billboard.com.
The original rendition of the song on the talent show has had millions of
views on YouTube and attracted celebrity followers including Demi Moore.
Now 50 Cent, the 34-year-old rapper who was shot nine times in 2000 before
finding fame, is the latest celebrity to praise Boyle.
“Susan Boyle is hot right now. I got to get her on a track, for real. We’d
make a hit,” he told the Daily Mirror.
“Everyone is talking about her, the lady from Britain’s Got Talent.
“She’s got an amazing voice, and together we’d get everyone dancing. I’m
always looking to do something new and she’s cool, so I’ll ask somebody to
let her know.”
He added: “I’d love to take her clubbing, show her around my world. She’d have
a great time.”
Boyle has also claimed topped the charts in Australia and Ireland.
Although she ultimately failed to win Britain's Got Talent, her April audition
for the show became an international YouTube phenomenon.
It has now been viewed more than 300 million times on the Internet.
It has since held
on to the spot on the album charts.
Boyle
is said to have already made £5million in two weeks from 3.3m global sales
of her debut album of the same name.
It was the best US opening for a female artist's debut album, and the second
best overall, since Nielsen SoundScan began tracking sales in 1991,
according to Billboard.com.
The original rendition of the song on the talent show has had millions of
views on YouTube and attracted celebrity followers including Demi Moore.
Now 50 Cent, the 34-year-old rapper who was shot nine times in 2000 before
finding fame, is the latest celebrity to praise Boyle.
“Susan Boyle is hot right now. I got to get her on a track, for real. We’d
make a hit,” he told the Daily Mirror.
“Everyone is talking about her, the lady from Britain’s Got Talent.
“She’s got an amazing voice, and together we’d get everyone dancing. I’m
always looking to do something new and she’s cool, so I’ll ask somebody to
let her know.”
He added: “I’d love to take her clubbing, show her around my world. She’d have
a great time.”
Boyle has also claimed topped the charts in Australia and Ireland.
Although she ultimately failed to win Britain's Got Talent, her April audition
for the show became an international YouTube phenomenon.
It has now been viewed more than 300 million times on the Internet.
wholesale nhl jerseys, mlb jerseys cheap
It was a sunny afternoon. The wind was warm and fresh as it flew and touches my bare skin. Students were all at the ball ground busy chatting, playing, jumping, and running as they gathered like busy ants on the field. The wind whispers their little tiny voices into my ears, echoing as they shout and laugh in my ear canal and hitting my three tiny bones as the message was sent into my brain. 'The busy students on the field.'
Students started to experience different kinds of things in their life as they start studying and as they mingled with their fellow ages. Growing up gives them adventures and new wonderful stories to tell. And here is a story about a girl on her going up stage.
While everybody was busy, I, Chloe Quenes was alone sitting on the grass. I was pulling the weeds while reading a book which describe my social boldness;
''Your Social Boldness: Introverted VS Extroverted. You are quite introverted. Socially, you prefer a more relaxed, low-key environment, rather than the hustle and bustle of a wild night in the city. You tend not to talk a lot, but when you do people listen, because when you say something it has meaning. You are not seeking the limelight, usually you prefer to let the attention-mongers do their thing while you observe. In an unfamiliar setting, you tend to be cautious and shy while you evaluate the circumstances. You prefer to avoid conflict, so you do not put yourself into a threatening situation. Your shyness may be perceived as unfriendly, but that could not be further from the truth. People need to be patient with you and take the time to get to know the complex, private you.''
While reading this first part of my personal evaluation, my friend came to tell me a “not- nice-word-to-hear”.
“Chloe, I have to tell you something!” my friend said.
“What is it?” I asked.
“Somebody has a crush on you!” she said again.
“Who is he?!!” I asked angrily.
“Look, there he is! He's a friend of your friend Daniel Dacer!”
I frowned and walked away. I didn't like anybody except my crushes on the 6th grade. They're Harry and Shaggy, the intelligent boys in their class.